ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Palliative care is an emerging scope of practice for paramedicine. The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the opportunity for emergency settings to deliver palliative and end-of-life care to patients wishing to avoid intensive life-sustaining treatment. However, a gap remains in understanding the scope and limitations of current ambulance services' approach to palliative and end-of-life care. AIM: To examine the quality and content of existing Australian palliative paramedicine guidelines with a sample of guidelines from comparable Anglo-American ambulance services. DESIGN: We appraised guideline quality using the AGREE II instrument and employed a collaborative qualitative approach to analyse the content of the guidelines. DATA SOURCES: Eight palliative care ambulance service clinical practice guidelines (five Australian; one New Zealand; one Canadian; one United Kingdom). RESULTS: None of the guidelines were recommended by both appraisers for use based on the outcomes of all AGREE II evaluations. Scaled individual domain percentage scores varied across the guidelines: scope and purpose (8%-92%), stakeholder involvement (14%-53%), rigour of development (0%-20%), clarity of presentation (39%-92%), applicability (2%-38%) and editorial independence (0%-38%). Six themes were developed from the content analysis: (1) audience and approach; (2) communication is key; (3) assessing and managing symptoms; (4) looking beyond pharmaceuticals; (5) seeking support; and (6) care after death. CONCLUSIONS: It is important that ambulance services' palliative and end-of-life care guidelines are evidence-based and fit for purpose. Future research should explore the experiences and perspectives of key palliative paramedicine stakeholders. Future guidelines should consider emerging evidence and be methodologically guided by AGREE II criteria.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Palliative Care , Australia , Canada , Humans , PandemicsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To (1) develop a simulation software environment to conduct prehospital research during the COVID-19 pandemic on paramedics' teamwork and use of mobile computing devices, and (2) establish its feasibility for use as a research and training tool. BACKGROUND: Simulation-based research and training for prehospital environments has typically used live simulation, with highly realistic equipment and technology-enhanced manikins. However, such simulations are expensive, difficult to replicate, and require facilitators and participants to be at the same location. Although virtual simulation tools exist for prehospital care, it is unclear how best to use them for research and training. METHODS: We present SPECTRa-Simulated Prehospital Emergency Care for Team Research-an online simulated prehospital environment that lets participants care concurrently for single or multiple patients remotely. Patient scenarios are designed using Laerdal's SimDesigner. SPECTRa records data about scenario states and participants' virtual interaction with the simulated patients. SPECTRa's supporting environment records participants' verbal communication and their visual and physical interactions with their interface and devices using Zoom conferencing and audiovisual recording. We discuss a pilot research implementation to assess SPECTRa's feasibility. RESULTS: SPECTRa allows researchers to systematically test small-team interaction in single- or multipatient care scenarios and assess the impact of mobile devices on participants' assessment and care of patients. SPECTRa also supports pedagogical features that could allow prehospital educators to provide individual trainees or teams with online simulation training and evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: SPECTRa, an online tool for simulating prehospital patient care, shows potential for remote healthcare research and training.